|
|
Post by TSilver on Oct 19, 2013 1:56:17 GMT -8
Anyone else notice that in all the ship statistics, it lists ship cargo capacity in tons? Shouldn't this be a capacity measured in volume? 5 tons of balsa wood is going to take up a lot more space than 5 tons of iron ore. Just a thought.  |
|
|
|
Post by PoorRichard (AKA - The Guido) on Oct 19, 2013 16:29:09 GMT -8
Yeah, it's been a gripe on the forums. We'll see what happens. I would hope in the end, that it becomes a measure of weight and volume. Also, however, we also have to think that these ships will have a gross weight and maybe that's what the weight we're seeing is referring to.
Only time shall tell.
|
|
|
|
Post by PoorRichard (AKA - The Guido) on Nov 10, 2013 14:20:51 GMT -8
Update! One of the questions answered during this week's Wingman's Hangar related this question exactly. The answer? Cargo will have size as well. In short, size matters!
|
|
|
|
Post by TSilver on Nov 10, 2013 18:33:05 GMT -8
Update! One of the questions answered during this week's Wingman's Hangar related this question exactly. The answer? Cargo will have size as well. In short, size matters! I knew my wife was wrong! |
|
